Integration
A Non-Intrusive API Overlay
The overlay reads from the systems already in operation, reasons over what they collectively mean, and returns a bounded instruction through the same APIs your teams already administer. Systems of record and enforcement remain authoritative.
Placement
Between Security Evidence and Security Action
- Primary control surface
- Identity-centric Zero Trust policy decisioning: IAM, PAM, CIEM, ZTNA, API authorization, and policy-based access mediation.
- Primary intelligence surface
- XDR, SIEM, SOAR, EDR, NDR, CNAPP, threat intelligence, vulnerability management, and data security.
- Primary function
- Correlate evidence, resolve contradictions, calculate contextual risk, simulate response options, govern authority, and deliver an auditable decision to the existing enforcement system.
- Telemetry in
- Governed decision
- Approved response
- Outcome and calibration back to evidence
Boundaries
What the Overlay Does Not Replace
The category is decision infrastructure. It is not a substitute for collection, enforcement, or storage.
Inbound
How Evidence Arrives
Authenticated connectors operate at defined workflow boundaries, scoped to the minimum data required for the decision in question.
REST APIs
Identity, asset, vulnerability, cloud, and policy data pulled on a scoped schedule.
Signed webhooks
Detections and access requests delivered at the moment they occur.
Event streams
High-volume security telemetry consumed continuously.
Batch submission
Historical incidents and control assessments for replay and calibration.
TAXII collections
Threat intelligence exchanged over the standard RESTful protocol.
Read-only connectors
Database or data-lake reads where a product exposes no usable API.
Normalization
Vendor-Neutral Schemas
Evidence is translated into open, machine-readable representations before any reasoning occurs, so conclusions do not depend on a single vendor's interpretation.
OCSF
Security events and detections
A JSON-based, implementation-agnostic schema for representing cybersecurity events across products and platforms.
STIX 2.1
Indicators, actors, campaigns, attack patterns, relationships
A machine-readable language for cyber-threat intelligence; TAXII carries it between parties.
MITRE ATT&CK
Adversary technique mapping
Used as a standardized behavioral vocabulary, not as a detection engine in itself.
MITRE D3FEND
Defensive countermeasure mapping
A knowledge graph used to move from a suspected technique to a contextually appropriate defensive action.
OpenTelemetry / OTLP
Application traces, logs, metrics, execution context
Transport for telemetry between sources, collectors, and backends where application context is relevant.
Evidence envelope
Internal provenance wrapper
Source, hash, timestamp, tenant, authority, quality, freshness, and lineage attached to every item.
Evidence layer functions
- Schema normalization across vendor formats
- Provenance capture and cryptographic hashing
- Validation against expected structure and range
- Deduplication of repeated and mirrored events
- Entity resolution across identity, asset, and workload namespaces
- Temporal alignment of observations recorded on different clocks
- Evidence quality scoring for reliability, freshness, and independence
Contracts
Cyber Decision Endpoints
Retrieval scoring, claims classification, contradiction scanning, provenance, and release gating operate behind these domain-specific contracts.
| Method | Endpoint | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /v1/cyber/events/ingest | Submit normalized security events and detections. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/incidents/evaluate | Adjudicate an incident hypothesis from correlated evidence. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/access/evaluate | Evaluate an access or privilege request in context. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/exposure/prioritize | Rank exposures by exploitability, reachability, and consequence. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/actions/simulate | Model the operational effect of a proposed control action. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/actions/authorize | Apply policy, authority, and release gates to an action. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/threat-intelligence/score | Score reliability, freshness, relevance, and corroboration. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/contradictions/scan | Detect material disagreement across evidence sources. |
| POST | /v1/cyber/outcomes | Return the observed result of an executed decision for calibration. |
| GET | /v1/cyber/decisions/{decision_id} | Retrieve a governed decision object. |
| GET | /v1/cyber/decisions/{decision_id}/audit | Retrieve the full audit and provenance record. |
Example request body
{
"request_id": "req_01",
"tenant_id": "enterprise_01",
"mode": "shadow",
"subject": {
"type": "human",
"identity_id": "user_4821",
"roles": ["cloud_operator"],
"assurance_level": 3
},
"action": {
"name": "assume_privileged_role",
"requested_duration_minutes": 30
},
"resource": {
"resource_id": "production_payments_cluster",
"criticality": "critical",
"data_classification": "restricted"
},
"context": {
"device_id": "device_991",
"device_managed": true,
"network_zone": "remote",
"authentication_method": "phishing_resistant_mfa",
"behavioral_deviation": "elevated"
},
"evidence_refs": [
"idp:event:123",
"edr:event:456",
"cnapp:finding:789",
"siem:incident:321"
],
"policy_envelope": {
"workflow": "privileged_access",
"jurisdiction": ["US"],
"maximum_autonomy": "recommend_only",
"human_approval_required": true
}
}Failure behavior
Never a Single Point of Failure
Availability of the decision layer must never be a precondition for the grantee organization operating their own security controls.
- Every integration carries a pre-established fallback policy
- If the decision layer is unavailable, control returns to the native deterministic system
- A kill switch disables write paths without disabling read paths
- Automated actions expire rather than persist indefinitely
- No integration is permitted to make the decision layer a single point of failure
Integration documentation describes structure, contracts, and governance. Proprietary scoring thresholds, model configuration, and reasoning internals are not published.
Connection status
Deployment begins with Google Workspace
Google Workspace is the first evidence connection in every grant deployment. Every other integration described on this site is planned: it becomes real only when the organization authorizes the vendor API and ArtOfTheHack validates the connection.
Current
Built and operable inside a grant deployment today, on the surfaces the organization has authorized.
- Google Workspace evidence connection
- KRYOS-XS Edge on approved mail, sharing and cloud-console surfaces
- KRYOS-XS Console decision queue and KRYOS Decision Ledger records
Pilot
Operated inside a bounded, time-limited grant pilot with pre-registered success criteria. Results are measured with the organization and are not published as product claims.
- Guided response workflows under named human approval
- Approval-gated actions on low-complexity action classes
- Board and funder decision reporting from the Ledger
Planned
Designed and specified, but not connected until the relevant vendor API is authorized by the organization and validated by ArtOfTheHack. No such connection is claimed as live.
- Identity-provider evidence, including Okta and Entra ID
- SIEM, EDR and MDM alert evidence
- Vulnerability, backup and cloud estate evidence
Long term
Platform direction. Not scheduled, not implied to exist, and never presented as available capability.
- Broader cross-vendor decision fabric coverage
- Sector policy packs co-developed with mission networks
- Coalition-wide decision reporting across member organizations
Nothing on this site describes a customer, a completed pilot outcome, an accuracy rate, a certification, an award or an existing partnership. Integrations exist only where an organization has authorized a real technical connection.
